![]() ![]() Russell Garwood in his article “Reach out to defend evolution,” complains that creationists present “perceived gaps in scientific knowledge as evidence in support of theistic world views.” Taking a biblical stand does not undermine science it illuminates science, just like reliable eyewitness testimony enables a detective to correctly interpret the circumstantial evidence at the scene of a crime. Do not go near it, so that you can see the way to go, since you have never traveled this way before. 4 But keep a distance of about two thousand cubits between yourselves and the ark. Science?Ĭan science and religion get along? Some secular scientists do seem to be making an effort to reach out the problem is that they are only reaching out to religious individuals who won’t let their faith “get in the way” of science. Crossing the Jordan 3 and commanded the people: When you see the ark of the covenant of the LORD your God being carried by the Levitical priests, you are to set out from your positions and follow it. Why is it that evolutionists are unwilling to allow for competing models, i.e., creation or even intelligent design? The hypothesis of evolution changes every year if one theory is said to be fact, but then a year later is shown to be wrong, then how can it be fact in the first place? A true fact is something that never changes. These definitions may help clear up confusion. In the creation/evolution controversy and battle over biblical authority, much of the dispute may become clearer if writers would carefully provide readers with precise definitions of terminology. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |